Current:Home > ScamsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -OceanicInvest
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-11 23:24:41
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (46927)
Related
- Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
- Nueva página web muestra donde se propone contaminar en Houston
- This Kimono Has 4,900+ 5-Star Amazon Reviews, Comes in 25 Colors, and You Can Wear It With Everything
- Calculating Your Vacation’s Carbon Footprint, One Travel Mode at a Time
- Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
- Methane Hunters: What Explains the Surge in the Potent Greenhouse Gas?
- Toxic Metals Entered Soil From Pittsburgh Steel-Industry Emissions, Study Says
- FTC sues Amazon for 'tricking and trapping' people in Prime subscriptions
- Rylee Arnold Shares a Long
- Judge Upholds $14 Million Fine in Long-running Citizen Suit Against Exxon in Texas
Ranking
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- The Largest U.S. Grid Operator Puts 1,200 Mostly Solar Projects on Hold for Two Years
- 'Los Angeles Times' to lay off 13% of newsroom
- California Had a Watershed Climate Year, But Time Is Running Out
- John Galliano out at Maison Margiela, capping year of fashion designer musical chairs
- Teacher's Pet: Mary Kay Letourneau and the Forever Shocking Story of Her Student Affair
- Why Florida's new immigration law is troubling businesses and workers alike
- Clean-Water Plea Suggests New Pennsylvania Governor Won’t Tolerate Violations by Energy Companies, Advocates Say
Recommendation
South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
The Energy Transition Runs Into a Ditch in Rural Ohio
The first debt ceiling fight was in 1953. It looked almost exactly like the one today
OceanGate wants to change deep-sea tourism, but its missing sub highlights the risks
Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
In Texas, a New Study Will Determine Where Extreme Weather Hazards and Environmental Justice Collide
A New Plant in Indiana Uses a Process Called ‘Pyrolysis’ to Recycle Plastic Waste. Critics Say It’s Really Just Incineration
‘Timber Cities’ Might Help Decarbonize the World